docs(spec): ruflo big-bang integration design v0.1 + cspell vocab
Full architectural inversion: ruflo Queen-led routing as top entry-point,
existing Pravila §12 / CLAUDE.md §5 п.10 / Pravila §5 ПДн / PSR_v1 R0
become sub-policies. 14 sections: goals, architecture (8→9 levels),
scope (32 plugins), big-bang sequencing (~1.5h compressed in-session),
map fork, memory bridge HNSW, cost-budget controls (\$10/day cap),
Windows daemon, safety walls, cost-benefit deliverable (9 benefits +
8 costs + 10 risks), verification, open questions (10 Q's pre-flight
Task 0), termination, self-review.
Brainstorming via superpowers:brainstorming, economy 0%. User chose
Approach A (Full big-bang) + «чистый верх» architectural model +
map fork (vs side-by-side / new layout) + cost-benefit table deliverable
+ compressed in-session execution path (vs 7-day staged).
cspell-words.txt additions (lowercase per user-dict case rule):
ruflo, ruvnet, hnsw, sona, ruvllm, многоагентный, форк, форка, bak.
Awaiting user review of written spec before invoking writing-plans.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Дмитрий
e55572e22c