Both tools check RLS compliance; the boundary "когда какой" was
undocumented (tracked as a RED conflict on the automation graph).
- .claude/skills/rls-check/SKILL.md: +section "Граница с агентом
rls-reviewer", +bullet in "Не использовать когда", +clause in
the frontmatter description.
- .claude/agents/rls-reviewer.md: +mirrored section "Граница со
скилом /rls-check", +bullet in "Out of scope", +clause in
the description.
- docs/automation-graph.html: conflict sk_rls<->ag_rls recolored
RED->GREEN (CONFLICT edge + both nd() node entries + EDGE_META).
- cspell-words.txt: +1 pre-existing word surfaced by the cspell
full-file scan of the now-staged SKILL.md.
Rule: one named table -> /rls-check; diff/branch/PR -> rls-reviewer.
The smoke test stays skill-only by design (running Pest in a review
subagent is slow and hits --parallel quirks 72/77).
Spec: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-16-rls-tooling-boundary-design.md
Plan: docs/superpowers/plans/2026-05-16-rls-tooling-boundary.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Дмитрий
bd27047aad
